By
Jo McClure, CPP
on
Aug
20,
2026
8 min read
0 comment(s)
.webp?width=1200&height=800&name=Jo-McClure-_1200-x-800-px_%20(1).webp)
Hiring employees across state lines can create payroll obligations long before anyone thinks of the company as a multistate employer.
An employee working remotely from another state may require different state and local income tax withholding, unemployment insurance tax treatment, payroll registrations, state-mandated deductions and new-hire reporting. And if an existing employee moves to another state, those requirements can change even though the employee's job does not.
For employers, accurate multi-state payroll starts with knowing where employees live, where they actually work and which rules apply to each payroll obligation.
A common starting point for multi-state payroll is the idea of "boots on the ground": Where is the employee physically performing services?
For many state and local payroll requirements, an employee's work location matters. However, employers should not assume one location automatically determines every tax and reporting obligation.
State income tax withholding may depend on both the employee's work state and state of residence. Unemployment insurance uses its own rules for determining which state receives unemployment taxes. Cities and other local jurisdictions may impose additional payroll taxes, while certain state programs require separate employee deductions or employer contributions.
As a result, adding an employee in a new state can require more than simply adding a different home address to the payroll system.
RELATED: 5 Best Practices for Pain-Free Payroll Processing >>
When an employee lives and works in the same state, state income tax withholding is often relatively straightforward. Multistate arrangements can become more complicated.
For an employee who lives in one state and works in another, employers need to determine which state's income tax withholding requirements apply. The answer depends on the laws of the states involved.
Some states have reciprocal agreements that allow qualifying employees who live in one state and work in another to have income tax withheld only for their state of residence.
Other situations are more complex. Certain states use "convenience of the employer" rules that may treat wages earned while working remotely outside the employer's state as taxable in the employer's state under certain circumstances. New York is one prominent example.
Employees also may have tax obligations in both their work and resident states, although resident-state tax credits may help prevent the same income from effectively being taxed twice. From the employer's perspective, the critical issue is determining the appropriate withholding treatment rather than assuming taxes should always be withheld where the employee lives.
Because state rules differ, payroll withholding should be evaluated whenever an employee begins working in a new state.
State withholding is not always the end of the analysis.
Some cities and other local jurisdictions impose income, occupational or other payroll-related taxes. Depending on the jurisdiction, the tax may apply based on where an employee lives, where the employee works or both.
That means two employees working in the same state could still require different payroll withholding because they live or work in different local tax jurisdictions.
Employers expanding their remote workforce should therefore evaluate both state and applicable local payroll taxes when setting up an employee's work location.
RELATED: Ask the Expert - How Long to Keep Payroll Records >>
State unemployment insurance (UI) taxes require a separate analysis.
Employers should not assume UI taxes automatically belong to the employee's state of residence or the state where the company's headquarters are located. The goal of the multistate UI rules is generally to assign an employee's services to a single state.
The analysis begins by determining whether the employee's work is localized in one state. Work generally may be considered localized when the employee performs all services in one state or performs services primarily in one state with only incidental work elsewhere.
If the employee's work is not localized in one state, additional tests generally consider:
The location from which the employee regularly starts work or conducts work-related activities.
The location from which the employer directs or controls the employee's work.
The employee's state of residence may become relevant when the previous tests do not establish the appropriate state.
These rules are particularly important for employees who regularly perform services in multiple states rather than working permanently from one remote location.
Interstate reciprocal coverage arrangements also may be available in certain circumstances, but they should not be viewed as a general way for employers to report unemployment taxes for all remote employees through the company's headquarters state.
Employers should determine the correct UI state and establish any required unemployment tax account before wages are reported.
Hiring an employee in a new state may require the employer to establish new payroll tax accounts before processing payroll.
Depending on the jurisdiction and the employee's circumstances, registrations may include:
Each program can have its own registration process, tax rate, wage base, filing schedule and payment requirements.
Payroll registration also is only one piece of hiring across state lines. Having an employee in another state may create broader business registration, workers' compensation and employment-law requirements.
Employers should identify both payroll and broader compliance requirements before an employee begins regularly working in a new state.
RELATED: Hiring Out-of-State Employees: 7 Compliance Risks Employers Should Know >>
Multistate payroll also may involve state programs that are funded through employee payroll deductions, employer contributions or a combination of the two.
Paid family and medical leave programs are one increasingly common example. Several states and the District of Columbia operate mandatory paid family and medical leave programs, and requirements differ considerably by jurisdiction.
Some states also maintain disability insurance or other employee benefit programs funded through payroll.
From a payroll perspective, employers may need to determine:
Rates, wage limits and program requirements can change, making ongoing payroll compliance important even after the initial setup is complete.
RELATED: The Surprising ROI of Payroll Outsourcing for Small Businesses >>
Employers generally must report newly hired and rehired employees within 20 days of the employee's hire date.
A company with employees in multiple states generally can handle new-hire reporting in one of two ways.
The employer may report each employee to the state where that employee works, following the applicable state's reporting requirements.
Alternatively, an eligible multistate employer may register as a multistate employer and designate one state in which it has employees as the state where it will report its newly hired and rehired employees. The employer must register its reporting choice and follow the federal multistate reporting requirements.
The federal Child Support Portal now provides the process for registering a company as a multistate employer and identifying the state where the company will submit its new-hire reports.
Importantly, selecting one state for multistate new-hire reporting does not mean that state also becomes the proper state for income tax withholding, unemployment insurance or other payroll taxes. Those obligations must be determined separately.
Multistate payroll issues do not arise only when a company hires someone new.
An existing remote employee may move across state lines, begin working regularly from a second home or relocate without recognizing that the change affects payroll.
Once an employee begins working from a new state, the employer may need to reevaluate:
The required changes may need to take effect based on when the employee begins working in the new jurisdiction, not when payroll eventually learns about the move.
For that reason, employers should require remote and hybrid employees to provide advance notice before changing their regular work location. Payroll can then review the new jurisdiction and make necessary changes before wages are processed incorrectly.
Employing people across state lines can expand a company's access to talent, but every new work location can add another layer to payroll compliance.
State and local withholding, unemployment insurance, payroll registrations, required deductions and new-hire reporting can all vary based on where employees live and work. A process that works correctly for one employee may not work for another employee performing the same job from a different state.
Axcet HR Solutions helps small and mid-sized businesses manage multistate payroll as part of our comprehensive PEO payroll services. Our payroll professionals support accurate payroll administration, tax withholding and reporting while helping employers manage the complexity that comes with a workforce spread across multiple states.
Written by
Jo McClure, CPP, is the Director of Payroll Administration at Axcet HR Solutions, where she has been a pivotal leader for over 20 years. With more than two decades of experience in payroll outsourcing and professional employer organizations (PEOs), Jo specializes in helping small to mid-sized businesses navigate payroll administration, employee benefits, and compliance.
Her strategic leadership at Axcet focuses on implementing best practices in payroll management, compliance auditing, and risk mitigation. Jo obtained her Certified Payroll Professional (CPP) designation in 2006 and has held numerous leadership roles in the Greater Kansas City Chapter of the American Payroll Association, including President, Vice President, and Chapter Coordinator. A frequent speaker at the Midwest Regional Payroll Conference, she has also contributed articles to publications such as Thinking Bigger Business and Kansas City Small Business Monthly.
Jo’s expertise has been recognized through industry publications. She co-authored the article “High-Touch in the Age of High-Tech: How PEOs Can Embrace AI Without Losing Their Humanity” https://peoinsider.org/articles/high-touch-in-the-age-of-high-tech-how-peos-can-embrace-ai-without-losing-their-humanity/ for PEO Insider (March 2026), alongside Jeanette Coleman, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, and authored “PEOs in the Community: Axcet Making Philanthropy Part of the Company’s Culture” https://peoinsider.org/articles/peos-in-the-community-axcet-making-philanthropy-part-of-the-companys-culture/ (November 2025). These contributions reflect her perspective on balancing technology-driven payroll and HR processes with the human experience, as well as the role of community engagement in building strong organizational cultures.
Jo's specialties include payroll implementation, compliance auditing, and crafting best-practice payroll solutions that ensure businesses stay compliant while optimizing their processes.
Published in: PEO Insider
Let us know what you think...